How a provider gets listed
Direct answer
What you need to know
Evidence strength: StrongNobody pays to be in this directory, nothing in it is ranked, and 6 of the 10 things we require are things we actually check. The other 4 are stated here anyway, marked as unverified, with what it would take to verify each one. A listing means a provider met a published standard and that we read their own terms on a stated date. It does not mean we recommend them, and we have not used any of them.
Key takeaways
- 15 providers, listed alphabetically inside their access-model group. No scores, no order of preference.
- One category is refused outright: anyone who dispenses without a medical evaluation.
- Four requirements are published without being verified, and each says what verifying it would take.
- Records are re-read on a schedule. The last sweep was 2026-08-11; the next is due 2026-09-10.
Important limitation: We report what providers publish about themselves. We are not auditors, we have not inspected a pharmacy or a licence, and no page can tell you whether a particular clinician is right for you.
Next action: The directory itself is at find a provider, and what we earn and from whom is set out in how we’re funded.
General education, not medical advice. A listing is not a recommendation.
Why there is no score
The usual way to build this page is to score each provider out of ten, publish the weighting, and disclose that some of them pay a referral fee — then state that the money does not affect the scores. That arrangement is common in this category and it is disclosed honestly by the sites that run it.
We have not built it that way, and the reason is structural rather than moral. A promise that payment does not move a number is only needed where payment and the number exist together. Ours is not a better promise; it is the absence of the mechanism. There is no order to buy, so there is nothing for a fee to change. That also costs us something real — a ranked list is more useful to a reader in a hurry, and we are choosing not to give them one.
What we require, and what we check
Every provider in the directory meets all of the following. The right-hand column is the part most standards leave out: whether the requirement is something we hold as a dated, sourced field, something we re-read each sweep, or something we ask for and cannot confirm.
| Requirement | Why it matters | How we check it |
|---|---|---|
| A licensed clinician evaluates the patient before any prescription is issued. | This is the line between a healthcare service and a shop. A seller that skips it is not a cheaper version of the same thing — it is a different thing, and it is the one category we refuse to list at all. | Recorded for every providerprescriberType |
| Pricing is published where a reader can find it without handing over personal details first. | A price you can only see after submitting your email and weight is a lead-capture step, not a price. Where a provider does this, the record says so instead of quietly carrying no figure. | Recorded for every providermembershipFee / cashPayFrom |
| If the service supplies compounded medication, it says so plainly rather than leaving a reader to infer it from the price. | Compounded semaglutide and FDA-approved Wegovy are not the same product under different branding, and the difference is not visible from a monthly figure. | Recorded for every providercompoundingDisclosure |
| The provider states where it operates. | Telehealth prescribing is regulated state by state. A service that does not say where it works cannot be checked against where you live. | Recorded for every providerstatesServed |
| Every field we publish is taken from the provider's own published page, carries that URL, and carries the date we read it. | It lets you check us. It also means a provider changing its terms shows up as our record going stale rather than as us being quietly wrong. | Recorded for every providersourceUrl / verifiedOn |
| The service still resolves, still describes a GLP-1 offering, and still publishes terms we can read. | Directories rot. A listing for a service that has changed or gone is worse than no listing, because it sends someone somewhere on our word. | Re-read at each sweep |
| Compounded medication is dispensed by a pharmacy registered with the FDA as a 503A compounder or 503B outsourcing facility. | It is the difference between a regulated compounder and an unregistered one, and it is the single most consequential fact about a compounded product. | Not verified by us |
| The clinician who writes the prescription is licensed in the patient's state at the time of prescribing. | A prescription written by someone not licensed where you are is a regulatory problem you inherit, not the provider. | Not verified by us |
| Patient data is handled to HIPAA standards. | You hand these services a weight, a medical history and a payment method before you get anything back. | Not verified by us |
| Any lab work the medication class calls for is arranged before prescribing. | It is one of the clearest markers separating a clinical service from a subscription that happens to involve a drug. | Not verified by us |
The 4 we do not verify
These are real requirements and we would not list a provider we knew to be failing them. But we do not confirm them, and a standard that only listed the boxes we tick would be marketing. Each one below says what verifying it would actually take.
Compounded medication is dispensed by a pharmacy registered with the FDA as a 503A compounder or 503B outsourcing facility.
It is the difference between a regulated compounder and an unregistered one, and it is the single most consequential fact about a compounded product.
What verifying it would take. Cross-checking each provider's named pharmacy against the FDA's registered outsourcing facility list and the relevant state board of pharmacy. Most providers in this directory do not name their dispensing pharmacy at all, so for those the check cannot begin — which is itself worth knowing, and is a stronger reason to publish this gap than to hide it.
The clinician who writes the prescription is licensed in the patient's state at the time of prescribing.
A prescription written by someone not licensed where you are is a regulatory problem you inherit, not the provider.
What verifying it would take. Per-state licence-board lookups for named clinicians. Providers publish the states they serve, not the roster of who is licensed where, so this would require asking each provider directly and having no way to confirm the answer.
Patient data is handled to HIPAA standards.
You hand these services a weight, a medical history and a payment method before you get anything back.
What verifying it would take. Reading each provider's notice of privacy practices and business-associate terms against its actual data flows. The first half is a legal review we have not done; the second is not observable from outside.
Any lab work the medication class calls for is arranged before prescribing.
It is one of the clearest markers separating a clinical service from a subscription that happens to involve a drug.
What verifying it would take. Recording each provider's stated pre-prescription requirements as a field, then re-reading it at each sweep. This is the most tractable of the four gaps here and the likeliest to be closed next.
A standard that lists only the boxes we tick is marketing. A standard that shows the unticked ones is a standard.
What we refuse to list at all
Sellers that dispense without a medical evaluation — grey-market “research peptide” vendors and no-prescription international sellers. Listing them, even with a warning attached, would place them on a page built to look trustworthy, which is precisely what our Medical Disclaimer tells readers not to accept.
How often this is re-checked
Every record carries the date we last read the provider’s own published terms. The most recent full sweep ran on 2026-08-11 and the next falls due 2026-09-10, a date this site publishes so the commitment can be held against us.
Where a sweep tries to re-read a provider and cannot — the page blocks us, or the price has moved behind a form — the record keeps its older date and is marked as blocked, rather than being stamped with the sweep date. The alternative would make every date on the directory a claim about our diligence rather than about the provider’s terms.
If we have something wrong
Tell us at corrections@glp1.healthcare, including the provider and what their own page says. Material corrections are published in our corrections log with the previous claim stated in full — not merely a policy describing how corrections would be handled, but the list of the ones we have actually made.
This page is general education, not medical advice. Talk to your own healthcare provider about your situation before starting, stopping, or changing any medication.